Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (14844)	5/29/2001 5:17:45 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Number 2 on your list is my favorite. Clean and crisp

To: Lane3 who wrote (14844)	5/29/2001 5:36:47 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I have a couple of queries regarding number 3 from you list,"Denigration." I figure, based on some of your past posts, that this is your favorite. Would you categorize tyrants and oppressors as "one's fellows?" How would you address someone who had breached trust with you and who maintains an entanglement that you simply can't ignor?

To: Lane3 who wrote (14844)	5/30/2001 12:56:52 AM
From: average joe	Respond to of 82486

Karen's Criteria for Wrongdoing 1. Violence except in defense of life or serious harm 2. Breach of trust 3. Denigration of the individual human dignity of one's fellows Good rules of thumb. But tell me if we "Breach Trust" to a child by not giving him or her the proper or "wrong" tools for survival what remedy do they have. If a child is forced to denigrate himself because he threw the ball to often in kindergarten to his friend what remedy does he have against his teacher for imposing illogical arbitrary rules. X has slightly unequal bargaining power against a small white male child and that must be taken into consideration.