Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: blake_paterson who wrote (73863)	5/30/2001 12:08:43 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

blake, so the assertion that rdram would begin to match ddr on a cost to customer basis was wrong. at least we all now agree on that. no more ignorance postulating the contrary. ;-) now we can go on to discuss why ddr is kicking rdram's butt. butt, alas, that wasn't the discussion, was it? nope, just that ddr would kick rdram's butt in cost to customer. btw, when was the last time you heard a customer ask why something was less expensive when they bought it? when was the last time a customer paid a lot more money for something only b/c the lower priced item was being sold at a loss? oh, and please cite your source that says rdram mfrs are making money.