Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sq39 who wrote (8182)	5/30/2001 11:36:35 AM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Remember the guy last week who asked Don about the possibility of a negated Class One Sell on the Naz?

To: sq39 who wrote (8182)	5/30/2001 3:51:52 PM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

Sq, >>>> so why can't this become a bear scenario where we should not be buying? <<<<< It could, but the probability is in favor of a bounce. Please understand that I work on probability, and in no way expect anything to be 100%, as I have mention previously. So for this specific signal to become bearish, that means that it becomes a negated signals. Since I started with my system, about 4+ years, I have not been able to identify a pattern which would give a hint of a negated signal, and I really dont use fundamentals to any significant degree, although I wont ignore important issues like FOMC meetings/etc.