Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Strauss who wrote (8192)	5/30/2001 1:05:39 PM
From: sq39	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

James Strauss, very informative, thanks for posting!!!

To: James Strauss who wrote (8192)	5/30/2001 1:34:31 PM
From: hamsandwich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

James, Strangely enough, your chart links pull up a nice 60min Infospace chart for me. Are you suggesting that as INSP goes, so goes the Naz? <vbg> I'm guessing just the usual SI problems. ham

To: James Strauss who wrote (8192)	5/30/2001 1:53:52 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

I get INSP as well when I click. What you do not explain is why you think each of the levels of support WILL fail. As far as I know, there is no way to tell that in advance. If possible, please explain how you can predict support failure. My understanding is that all you can do is to look and see if support holds. If it does, you have a bottom. If not, you then look to the next level for a bottom. In fact, on your theory, 1600 has no reason to hold. As you state, if it does hold, that will be a double bottom. But that is a grammatical point only