Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ahh Canada - 2 out of 3 ain't bad -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shaw who wrote (2671)	5/31/2001 12:03:31 PM
From: Cush	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5144

Hi Shaw. I can't answer that question. I'll try to think about that when I'm reviewing charts in the evening, for the next few days. If I see anything that confirms that such a spread is sustainable, I'll post again. Now, more ranting. Notice on that SUF chart that volume spike. I'd guess that almost every chart that comes up on my scans shows a volume spike, then tapering volume. With the volume spike, the price often spikes, too. Seems to me that only those who know when the volume spikes are coming are able to play these effectively. Wouldn't it be nice to know ahead of time that some fund has decided to buy 500,000 shares of some stock that's trading about 25,000 shares a day? I'm watching a pretty typical, recent day, here. Several issues I'm watching (because I own them, or am thinking of owning them) are up marginally. Problem is they are only up if the offers to sell keep getting hit, because the offers to buy are below yesterday's close. So, it looks good, only if no one wants to sell. End of this rant. Cush

To: Shaw who wrote (2671)	5/31/2001 1:23:00 PM
From: Tom McIlwain	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5144

Shaw: On your SUF chart, I would pay more attention to the value of the ADX than the spread between DI. 35 is by no means an extreme value. When it gets above 50 is when you have to start wondering. That rebound off the previous high at 3.50ish looks pretty good to me. Tom

To: Shaw who wrote (2671)	5/31/2001 7:02:18 PM
From: Davy Crockett	Respond to of 5144

Hi Shaw, I honestly don't know. Hell've of a spread. I remember a little while ago you & Shack were discussing this one. I put it back on the ticker, & then I promptly forgot about it :( (forgot to put an alert on it), I think you guys were yapping about the 3.50 resistance area or so... I could be wrong... (usually am) LOL I'll check my resources when I get a chance & see if anything is in there. Maybe Bob can comment. Regards, Peter

To: Shaw who wrote (2671)	6/5/2001 10:28:42 PM
From: Davy Crockett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5144

Hi Shaw, Oops! I meant to say... good move on dumping the poots. Good Risk Management skills! Any word on SUF.to yet? I guess we will have your answer whenever the halt is lifted. Just an educated guess... but according to the chart... I think it wants to go much, much, higher...FWIW & WTFDIK & of course, as Rise is fond of saying & I quote "Don't listen to me because I am just a novice investor". Waddya think? stockcharts.com[m,a]daclyymy[pc20!c50][vc60][iUl14!La12,26,9!Lh14,3] ...which I had bought some <sign> :( Very nice weekly chart stockcharts.com[l,a]wacayymy[pb5!b10!b200!d20,2!h.02,.20!f][vc60][iUl14!Lc20!Ld20!Le12,26,9!Lf!Lb14] and monthly... stockcharts.com[m,a]maclyymy[pc20!c50][vc60][iUl14!La12,26,9!Lh14,3] GREAT, GREAT charts! Hope ya have some! We will know very soon, Regards, Peter