SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave B who wrote (73972)5/31/2001 2:08:50 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
OK now I am confused (a little knowledge is a dangerous thing)!

So you are both agreeing that one cannot fit enough RDRAM in a server. At least not the kind of server that IA-64 was made for. Yet somehow Intel saw fit to make McKinley RDRAM compatible?! Why? It seems to me that based on what I've read here, DDR is a much better choice for McKinley.

Sun (I still don't know but now I'm dizzy) Tzu



To: Dave B who wrote (73972)5/31/2001 2:13:38 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 93625
 
"LOL! Whatever you want to believe, Ali."
So, do you doubt U.S. Court testimonies, or what?

"the [Rambus] ability to get large amounts of memory into the system"

According to estimations, it is still a show-stopper
fir Rambus to make 64GB of memory. Are you saying that
Intel plans McKinley as a toy computer?

- Ali


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News