SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (136461)6/1/2001 11:23:11 AM
From: Tushar Patel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Playing by the rules: How Intel avoids Antitrust Litigation

Fascinating article in the Best Practice series of the current (June 2001) issue of Harvard Business Review (one of the authors is David Yoffie). I had no idea how thorough and methodical Intel's management was with this. Tools included extensive training, mock depositions and random raids of employees' files, email and disks.

For me, reinforces just how systematic and meticulous Intel management is. I don't think the article is accessible online but here is an abstract:

hbsp.harvard.edu

tushar



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (136461)6/1/2001 12:12:23 PM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary your post makes Zero Sense.

For simplicity I'll use the lower 30Million chips per quarter

Q1'01 Q2'01 Q3'01 Q4'01 2001

29M+(1M P4) 28M+(2M) 26M+(4M) 22M+(8M) 107M+ 13M P4's



As Intel sells more P4's it sells less Celeron's and Piii's

M.