Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : John, Mike & Tom's Wild World of Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wlheatmoon who wrote (2352)	6/1/2001 4:06:41 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2850

Didn't see no fires, but I did have fun. I think that nuclear is the way to go if California is to solve its energy woes. But, I don't know if my fellow state-mates would allow anymore evil nuclear plants in our pristine state....maybe when their air conditioners don't work for a week straight they will change their mind. For my high school senior term paper, my topic was Alternate Energy Sources. My favorite (other than nuclear) is tidal plants. We could put one across the mouth of San Francisco Bay and provide power to most of the state.

To: wlheatmoon who wrote (2352)	6/1/2001 4:12:50 PM
From: Logain Ablar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2850

Mike: I posted to Heinz last week I think coal and nuclear have had their run with a Democratic leadership in the senate. The environmental issue is too easy to attack Pres. Bush on. Over the weekend I ran with a friend who is pretty well connected with State Democratic party and he was ranting about Bush and Cheeny and big oil. I think its the party line for a while. In CT they just passed a bill which will close 3 coal power plants (we have a democratic house and senate) and the Republican Governor is going to sign it. I would just think the run in coal and uranium is over for now. Hey just my 2 cents since we all know I can be wrong. Have a good weekend everyone Tim