Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (74085)	6/1/2001 9:48:32 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 93625

In addition to previous reasons we went through, another thought occured to me. The judge in Micron's case decided to waite for Payne's judgement. I wondered that if Payne's decision becomes a significant factor in Micron's case and is later overturned, then Micron's win (assuming they win) will easily be overturned as well. Whereas now, if Micron wins the case on their own (using whatever info they've gained from Infineon's) then even if Payne's decision is overturned, the Micron case stands. Which then Infineon can use to their advantage in the (possible) future rounds. Next week should be interesting. Not only to see how the market reacts to this legal twist, but (more importantly IMO) to hear what Intel has to say in their mid Q CC. Sun Tzu