To: russwinter who wrote (57 ) 6/2/2001 7:51:06 PM From: craig crawford Respond to of 1643 Thanks. The article adds more depth and some additional viewpoints which just couldn't be put into the topic header due to space constraints. My thoughts echo most of what was said. I liked how he started off talking about natural gas and commodities in general, but I was disappointed when he steered the article toward conspiracies surrounding gold, and he even made a suggestion that gold should parallel the seven-fold price movement of NG. Well there are some major differences between natural gas and other energy related natural resources and gold. Eighty percent of gold demand is for jewelry, and that demand can be quite elastic. Energy is not totally inelastic, but it is much less so than gold. People need oil, gas, and coal right now. Who needs gold? There just aren't that many industrial uses for it. It could take several years before central bank selling exhausts itself and production slows to the point that there are serious shortages. I'm not saying gold is a terrible investment here, I think it could hit $500 within the next 5 years, which is a decent return. I would rather hold unhedged gold stocks for the next 5 years than richly valued tech stocks. But there is a big difference between things that we need to function in our daily lives such as food, energy, clothing, basic materials etc, and jewelry which just sits there and looks pretty. Many of the other base metals have more out of whack supply demand relationships than gold and they serve critical industrial uses. We need things like copper, zinc, lead, aluminum, nickel, etc. I haven't done enough research yet to run across a huge number of commodities bulls, but the few I have run across usually wind up talking about gold or silver. Jim Rogers is the only commodities bull I am aware of who has correctly been bearish on gold all the way since he shorted it at $675 back in 1980. I would like to find some commodity bulls who have something positive to say about other commodities other than the always talked about energy & precious metals. Nonetheless, I am still very interested in following the volatile action in gold recently and I am keeping one eye on the lookout to see if technology can come up with some new uses for the metal that might actually increase demand in a significant way. Most gold bulls are betting on total financial collapse or short covering rallies as the impetus for some four digit explosion in price. I'm more interested in seeing if science can come up with some new application that will convince central bankers to hold out for higher prices, and will spur enough demand to meet any selling head-on. Runaway inflation or massive short-covering would just be a bonus.