SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : SEVU: New Invention of Great Potential... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1815)6/2/2001 11:12:35 PM
From: Q.  Respond to of 1992
 
re. <<I successfully SUED TRIM for FRAUD and CIVIL THEFT...>>

this one?

Francois  Goelo  had filed an action in Hillsboro County Circuit Court (Case  No.  00-1444)  against  TrimFast  Group,
Inc., Michael Muzio and certain other parties in connection with alleged non-delivery of 22,000 shares of TrimFast
and 100,000 shares of common stock of Sierra Holdings Group. The complaint, is a multi-count complaint and
included counts for breach of contract, specific performance, fraud and civil theft. The complaint alleged that
a total of $95,750 ($77,000 for the TrimFast shares) was delivered as per the instructions of Mr. Muzio. The shares
of common stock that had not been delivered to Mr. Goelo, as Mr. Muzio has advised the Company, were shares of
common stock personally owned by Mr. Muzio. The Plaintiff sought delivery of the shares of common stock pursuant
to the agreement and sought compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $790,000. On May 3, 2000 plaintiff
offered to settle this matter whereby Mr. Muzio would pay $95,750 and transfer to the plaintiff 20,000 shares of
TrimFast common stock. In addition, the settlement offer provided that the parties will enter into a joint stipulation
for dismissal of the action and execution of a general release. We subsequently signed a written settlement agreement
with Mr. Goelo and Mr. Muzio, and Mr. Goelo has released the other parties, including the Company, from all liabilities
or obligations. As part of this settlement, the litigation was dismissed and the Company was not required to make
any payment, or give any shares, to Mr. Goelo.

secinfo.com



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1815)6/3/2001 11:41:30 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 1992
 
FG 666. I read the terrible thing that happened to you when you had sued Trimfast.WE no know you never got any of the 18,000 warrants of Trimfast. But they where going to pay you them for something? Right? Just because you never got them because they did not deliver them to you does not mean that you where not a
promoter/consultant? Just means that you where an unpaid promoter/consultant that got screwed? LOL

I ask this because there is a guy named Slash-it posting on the trimfast board on ragingbull and his situation
seems identical to yours. I know its not you though because you have stated you only post under your own
name.

It would be good to clear this up if you could tell us why they were to give you 18,000 warrants in the first place.

Sir AURIC honorable poster



To: Francois Goelo who wrote (1815)6/4/2001 12:25:42 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 1992
 
And did you get your tout warrants in XNET?? Looks like another one of your failures that won't be paying the chicken coup rent.

10kwizard.com

10kwizard.com

You are low life scum that steals money from foolish investors. You shall rot in Haides.