Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (15298)	6/2/2001 9:38:56 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 82486

Quite possibly. Even if they were still in good health at 150. There would probably be a few who were still going strong mentally at 3000, though. Long lifespans would certainly change the calculus of life. Retire at 65? How? Who make all the goodies you want since soon almost everyone is 65? Retirement at 125 with a 150-year lifespan? What if life can be extended into the thousands of years? Never retire? Periodic repeating retirement when you accumulate funds to finance it for a while?