Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SOROS who wrote (14642)	6/3/2001 6:03:19 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22706

we are at or very near the 6000 year mark of people's existence I do suppose this depends on your definition of "people", but I would bet that you would be hard pressed to come up with any definition that would separate hominids of the last 6,000 years with those from 60,000 years back and then some. For that matter, at 600,000 we clearly had hominids that were enough different than any other primate that one would be hard put to think of them as anything but close ancestors. And, in terms of a unique separate "human" line, it sure looks like 2-3X that, if not 10X.

To: SOROS who wrote (14642)	6/3/2001 6:48:58 PM
From: FaultLine	Respond to of 22706

Keep thinking me crazy, but... I see you like bats... --cfl@whatacoincidence,iwasjustthinkingaboutbats.com

To: SOROS who wrote (14642)	6/3/2001 7:05:01 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 22706

Those who dismiss it with a closed mind risk a great deal I don't want to start an argument with a "Bible Thumper", particularly on this thread, which is supposed to be about nothing. So go your own way and leave us to our nonsense here.