SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: peter_luc who wrote (42374)6/4/2001 8:24:16 AM
From: niceguy767Respond to of 275872
 
peter:

Great post...No reason for OEM's to be held captive by INTC any longer if "crush" lives up to its billing...

Looks like we are about to witness the dawning of a "new order" in the microprocesssor sector!!!

Short lived is the giddiness at INTC that Paul was talking about, I'd think!!!



To: peter_luc who wrote (42374)6/4/2001 11:50:48 AM
From: dale_laroyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
>It was obvious from the manner in which Mr. Tomasi answered these questions that Nvidia was not concerned about supporting Intel's processors with nForce, and was quite willing to go it alone with good buddy AMD.<

I suspect this is wrong. I anticipate that nVidia will introduce a P4 chipset based on the Crush12 at the beginning of 2002.



To: peter_luc who wrote (42374)6/4/2001 12:59:49 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
peter, I think nVidia is pissed off at Intel because they developed the entire Xbox architecture with a view to using LDT and the Athlon, and then at the last minute, $Bill switched to Intel. nVidia certainly knew which CPU gave better performance and it wasn't Intel. A cheaper, slower Intel CPU puts more demands on the graphics subsytem to meet the performance goals of the XBox. In addition, in the PC arena, Intel may have pushed nVidia to put Athlon de-optimizations into their graphics drivers or some similar slime-bucket tactic.

Petz