Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flatsville who wrote (106377)	6/4/2001 1:50:05 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

That's because you tacked "head of household" to one of your sample figures and claimed that as totally representative of that group. I've seen 40% on other reports as single. Your statistics also fail to distinguish seniors and people on work leave from institutions from your adult sample group, some of whom are not supporting children. Have fun with tacking on a descriptor to that group that works for your argument.

To: flatsville who wrote (106377)	6/6/2001 12:09:22 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<DAK, 'ya know Les is a big boy and he's perfectly capable of fighting his own battles. He does some homework. He doesn't need you checking his math. > ROFLMAO... wasn't checkin HIS, your attack was such a glaring bumble I couldn't pass it up. <Since when is the difference of 100%-72% which is 28% closer to a third (33%) than it is a quarter (25%?)> Hello McFly??? Anybody home??? [Tap tap on head]... he didn't say that, god I wish you could read... he said 1/3 weren't supporting families.. you're data backs him up. DAK