SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (150656)6/4/2001 1:24:59 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Toldja you wouldn't.

I don't suppose you will do what I asked, and provide one issue, one statement, one argument, one "case," that you consider "lousy"? I haven't had "a" case. I've had many examples of their being liars and deceivers. Show me where you felt i went wrong!

I am getting used to this. You won't.

You are here because they showed themselves to be disreputable fools, and you want to help salvage them by offering not exculpating documentation, but a positive personal testimonial for them and a negative one for me.

You answered with a generalization. Yet I asked you two small, specific questions. (Your guys don't like specific questions, I have observed.)

Do you agree with me about what the word 'admit' connotes? If you do, I will show you how its use by Mike was dishonest, and he can tell you where i['m wrong, lol. (The lol is because he takes no responsibility for what he says, and declines to answer when asked to.)

Do you agree with me about what the phrase 'intimate relations' connotes? If you do, I will show you, if you doubt it, that twt introduced it here not when he was confused about my gender, but when he knew that i am female, straight, married, and was talking about personal friends, not personal sexual experiences.



To: Neocon who wrote (150656)6/4/2001 1:27:56 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Message 15890925

To:E who wrote (150568)
From: Thomas A Watson Monday, Jun 4, 2001 12:34 PM
Respond to of 150659

Dear e, we both agree that you from your words are far more an expert in practice in
the ways of spreading aids and my words on the culture come from a report that I had read.
you all have a nice day now hear.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

The above was just posted by your pal twt. Do you excuse it on the grounds that he was unclear about my gender? On any other grounds? Does it give you pause regarding your defense of the use of 'intimate relations' by him three days ago?

Just wondering.