Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (51963)	6/4/2001 4:53:34 PM
From: bosquedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

chart.yahoo.com what dates and prices are you using to compute the 35%?

To: American Spirit who wrote (51963)	6/4/2001 7:23:29 PM
From: maverick61	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

LOL - all those companies and a host of others all had products - do you recall INKT, AKAM, INSP, SCMR, etc. They too all had valuations exceding 30 billion. Don't delude yourself into thinking that was a non bubble valuation on PALM. It was an overpriced, overhyped POS that came out during the bubble and soared like everything else before falling back to earth. I remember the day it IPO'd, I made a killing shorting COMS. And as far as the 35% you note - well 2 things. First and foremost it seems you once again have chosen to stretch the truth, i.e. LIE here on the thread in regard to your returns. Not surprising given your history here posting inaccurate trades and results, but whatever floats your boat. Second, if you would read, the thing that myself, Glenn Peterson, Jason W and probably a few others I am missing were addressing you on was your ludicrous statements concerning the no cash flow problems, and long term market cap targets of PALM you so disingenously throw around to try and pump your daytrades. None of us questioned nor debated the merits of daytrading or even swing trading PALM. But to make false and inaccurate statements concerning the company longer term - all in the hope that those statements will help pump your short term positions while you dump them deserves a response. And that is why not only I, but numerous others responded to your posts. Now that the facts again have been made clear, and you have exposed yourself once again as a liar, I think enough has been said and my work is done on this matter. Cheers !!!!!