SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fyodor_ who wrote (42513)6/4/2001 6:35:18 PM
From: Joe NYCRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Fyo,

Exactly the point. Essentially, you could build an XBox clone using a P4 instead of a PIII. This would seriously boost performance.

I am still missing the point. NVidia already has a chipset for Athlon (which performs better than P4), they don't need a license for Athlon current bus, they are part of the HT team for future Athlon processors, so where would be the motivation to create an Xbox killer based on P4, where they would be starting from scratch, and swimming upstream vs. Athlon platform, where they already have most of the pieces together.

Joe



To: fyodor_ who wrote (42513)6/4/2001 6:52:29 PM
From: ptannerRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
fyo, Re: "Exactly the point. Essentially, you could build an XBox clone using a P4 instead of a PIII. This would seriously boost performance."

But wouldn't this cost a LOT more than a loss-leader XBox? I guess you might also have an XBox clone which could also serve as a general use computer.

And would XBox games really benefit from a faster processor if they have been optimized for XBox? Basically, would you have the options to increase the game settings to a level far beyond the capabilities of the XBox?

-PT