SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ThirdEye who wrote (151013)6/5/2001 1:25:06 PM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 769670
 
Being wrong on the issue of global climate change is more disastrous if we are actually cooling than if we are warming. The last mini-ice age nearly drove humanity off the european continent. Based on what we really know about climate change there is a 50/50 chance for either scenario to be right. We have great beaches here in Chicago and palm trees would really set them off.



To: ThirdEye who wrote (151013)6/5/2001 1:44:18 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
The fraud is the assertion that science has proven or even has data strongly suggesting HUMANS are causing the warming that may or may not be occurring.

And it is a FACT that many of those 2000 scientists you refer to study in areas having nothing to do with climate research and know no more about the topic than any other layman in the field - if that fact means anything to you..



To: ThirdEye who wrote (151013)6/5/2001 2:08:51 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
"Scientists disagree". You and others have been swallowing that whole forever. Scientists with expertise in the area of stury DO NOT support the global warming fraud. It has been proven over and over on this thread with references from elsewhere which the left-wing media (& the tabloids, which is all you read) refuse to recognize.

But you are and always will be a dupe of the left, repeating EVERY lie they tell. You are only comfortable when you don't have to think for yourself.



To: ThirdEye who wrote (151013)6/5/2001 2:33:56 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
techcentralstation.com

The science is not good....yet.



To: ThirdEye who wrote (151013)6/5/2001 2:40:58 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 769670
 
techcentralstation.com

The science is not good....yet.

oism.org

20,000 scientists signed this one.