Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jaci Kidd who wrote (23060)	6/5/2001 9:24:47 PM
From: Digrdug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Apologize?? Jaci, your post about the relationship between the GE concession and the BMG mine was totally false!! It is like saying there must be a gold deposit three hundred miles from Hemlo because there is one at Hemlo. I understand that you were not knowledgable of the area but you were still wrong!! As far as the Kevin saga goes I believe that he was trying top pull off some kind of fast one on the shareholders with his "death spiral" floorless debentures. I have had my permanent residence in BC all my life and have followed many mining scams. Bay Street kicked the bums out in the sixties and they flocked to Vancouver. So it amazes me that sheeple, mostly from the US, would become such zealots over just another gold mining scam!! How do you feel that no analyst, geologist, or any other independent mining expert will endorse the this company?? Jim asked one years ago and he said not to touch it!! So, I have a lot of personal experience in that area and a history of closely watching mining scams!! What are your qualifications in this area?? Cheers, Doug Just looking at reality, no insult intended

To: Jaci Kidd who wrote (23060)	6/6/2001 2:17:41 PM
From: Digrdug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Jaci, no, I guess we did not “sort it out” My recollection of the events: On SI, in post # 17373, you wrote: “Tim Good Morning: Two of the Companis I met with one being Battle Mountain, they are mining approximately 1 million ounces of gold at this time, and the other which is Samex out of Vancouver, they are still drilling, both of these companies are mining just on the other side of where the GE property is. They both are anxious to hear GE's report. They were extremely helpful and showed us maps of where GE is and where they are drilling. Cheers Jaci” So on RB in 5574 I wrote: From Jaci on SI “Two of the Companies I met with one being Battle Mountain, they are mining approximately 1 million ounces of gold at this time, and the other which is Samex out of Vancouver, they are still drilling, both of these companies are mining just on the other side of where the GE property is. They both are anxious to hear GE's report. They were extremely helpful and showed us maps of where GE is and where they are drilling.” THIS REPORT IS COMPLETELY FALSE! Battle Mountain is mining approx. 300,000 ounces of gold per year in a high altitude, hard rock location approx. 400 kilometres from Cangalli. Interymi near Oruro, With the current POG they are reported to be losing money and considering shutting down. I had a meeting with the Samex people and they told me, in no uncertain terms, that they had no interest in alluvial deposits. Sheeesh, the stories around this company!!!” So you came back over to RB with the following response: 5574 “You know Dirdoug as usual you are an a-hole. I said they are mining approx 1 million ounces I didn't say it was from the same area. Now I know why you are friends with Cima???” I thought hmnn, odd reaction!! So I said: 5576 “Sorry dearie, but: You said, “both of these companies are mining just on the other side of where the GE property is.” Four hundred kilometres is hardly just “the other side” That is like Alberta is just near Vancouver Island or California is “just near” Seattle. This is typical of sleazy mining hypesters like happened in Labrador after Voisey Bay. 30% of one million ounces can hardly be considered "close to" or "approx." As far a me being an a-hole, it is my view that it is you that is acting like an orifice but that it is the adjoining one, in your case.” Your response!! 5578 “Dirtdoug: F---k off you are an #######, not even a good ####### just an ###. I saw your picture an ugly #######?/ sorry you are just to homely for anyone I know, sorry” My response!! 5579 “Another mature adult response from another well inmformed Golden Eagle zealot. After 13 surgeries to reconstruct my face, most people tell me that the guy did a good job. Same doctor that fixed up Silken after her rowing crash. Why are you so angry just cause you got called on spreading hype about your beloved GE? Reread your post. It simply was nowhere close to the truth. BTW, Samex is still an exploration company and is not actually mining anywhere. Oh well, just another widdle fib.” And it went on and on!! Hardly “pinning my ears back” So tell me again how you are such a “lady” that I need to be a “gentleman” and apologize!!

To: Jaci Kidd who wrote (23060)	6/6/2001 8:05:31 PM
From: john	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

she stated clearly that this was a unique find I understand that she stated clearly in her judgement favoring Terry Turner that, her comments in NO WAY should be construed as to whether the gold WAS THERE or WAS NOT THERE I felt she made it plain her decision was only whether or not Turner acted reasonably putting out the infamous release. Thus GUYS and GALS much work is still required and for that work to continue they need, MONEY which GE believers immediate family is going to provide, just when is the question. The G&A expenses are disturbing but they are there nuttin you or I can do about them.