Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JRI who wrote (106794)	6/6/2001 12:18:02 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

>>wasn't physically necessary to transport slaves to Germany<< Huh?! Can look up exact numbers, but think of a replacement for X millions of German soldiers who were away an all kinds of different fronts. You may build a new factory in Auschwitz, if youre IG Farben, but no way to move farms (Bauernhoeffe) to Poland, for instance. Same applies to mid and small-size factories: People had to be "invited" to come to Germany to man them. dj

To: JRI who wrote (106794)	6/6/2001 1:18:05 AM
From: Eddy Blinker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

..(for the most part) it wasn't physically necessary to transport slaves to Germany to do so>>> JRI, Now we all know what you did not spell out.But why so hesitant? The Germans just started to pay up on their history of slave labour which included General Motors somehow if I am correct. When is Corporate America ready to pay as well namely compensation to all the direct descenders of former slaves. You think you could get your government to pay at least 50% as well?With stuff like that one can win elections and be Mr.Good for a while. Regards, ED PS.Think of all those spending hands afterwards. Beats those autobahn projects anytime.