SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (106941)6/6/2001 2:52:42 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
>>Malinvestment" is something to be determined afterwards, isn't it? <<

Yes, mostly ... but it is not simply that something turned out to be a "bad" investment.

>>Does anyone deliberately invest his/her money in something non-productive? <<

I would guess not ...

>>
What is the name of the second guy to invent the radio or the electric light bulb? The one who didn't get the patent? Was his work a waste of time? Did he know that?

Did the people who loaned him money know they were throwing their money away? If so, why did they do it? <<

But the term as used in common parlance has to do only with the differences in invesetment engendered by overly accomodative monetary policy.

It is a reasonable question to ask: What failures were due to simply miscalculation on the part of the entrepreuner, other unforseeable economic shifts and what were due to an overly accomodative monetary policy?

It's not a terribly easy question to answer because all these things happen simultaneously and sometimes exacerbate one another ...



To: Ilaine who wrote (106941)6/6/2001 2:52:52 PM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 436258
 
skip



To: Ilaine who wrote (106941)6/6/2001 7:38:14 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<Does anyone deliberately invest his/her money in something non-productive?>

Yes, during manias. For example, during the dot com mania, most venture capital investments in dot coms were not done to build a productive (profitable) company but rather to float an IPO as soon as possible and pocket the public's money.