Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1281)	6/6/2001 3:40:26 PM
From: gold$10k	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4051

CC, I disagree with RR also, but for technical reasons. I see this as simply a retracement back to trendline support... and besides, it's only C$0.11 above it's all time low. askresearch.com I bought more than half of those shares @ C$0.71 myself... one of those unexpected bargains for which I like to keep some cash on hand. vt

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1281)	6/6/2001 3:59:59 PM
From: baystock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4051

<Pre-feasibility studies, completed earlier this year on the other Meadowbank deposits, established a 2.5 g/t in-pit economic cut-off grade and projected total cash costs under $US200 per ounce gold with a 2500 ton per day operation. The majority of intersections from the Vault deposit surpass this grade and occur at shallow depths offering potentially low- strip ratio open pit additions. Mr. Kerry Curtis> CC, At $200 an oz cash costs, these Meadowbank deposits look uneconomic at current gold prices. I would expect the total costs to be much higher, given their location in the Artic.