SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (15825)6/6/2001 3:29:29 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The SI admins are arbitrary and capricious, and there's no appeal procedure there either. It's all a joke.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (15825)6/6/2001 4:09:09 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 82486
 
Rekax. My post was not contentious. I was merely referring to the fact that tou's apply equally to all threads. As to the fact that moderated threads allow members beneath admin to set certain standards without wasting admin's time--which is to say, they may moderate disruptive and undesirable people off or back on the thread in the interests of the participants--well, people are entitled to differ on the merits of this. Keep in mind that individuals were already allowed to moderate whose posts appear to them on the threads they frequent.

But as it is, it's arbitrary and capricious, and there is no appeal procedure

It is only as arbitrary and capricious as the moderator is arbitrary and capricious. So it may, or it may not be those things. There is an appeal procedure. Banned members may be unbanned. There are the considerations of peer pressure and respect which serve to constrain the arbitrary possibilities of the moderator.

Certainly, a moderator can moderate in unfair ways. Likewize any member may act in unfair ways. If you are seeking justice, you are on the wrong planet.

Our membership allows us to start moderated threads. It is therefore considered ethical and legal by the owners of the community.

Why should some members be prevented from enjoying what they have paid for? For instance, when someone is being stalked all over SI, say by a mental midget, and is having her/his enjoyment of membership thus violated--why should the only recourse for that person be to painstakingly gather evidence, and to be always vulnerable to the time when the mental midget is once again given a password? Why should whole groups of people be subjected to the sniping of a pea brain? I don't buy it, and neither did SI. I can respect your opinion; I just don't agree with it.

Personally, I think permanent removal from a thread except as a last resort is small minded, but in a virtual community where homesteading is available to all, I can buy it. If I am moderated off a thread there is either a good or a bad reason. If it is a bad reason, then I am content to avoid their company.