Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (151273)	6/6/2001 7:30:16 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

<< Dear delly, I went back read some of your posts. I'm an engineer and my opinion is that you have the opinion of the generic vacant liberal minded techno retard. That means you are a clueless nitwit with little to no understanding of technology. You mind is well programmed with greeney google goop. >> So, I see that you are one of those who thinks that you can raise your credibility by name calling and ridicule. Does it make you feel all superior? There...that's better. BTW, it doesn't bother me. I know that most of the right wingers here are Rush inspired, and I have learned to expect and ignore it. << Have you read any of the President Energy plan? Of course not. You prefer to have your head of your butt and read who knows what. Although from you posts I might conclude you have read nothing. >> And you also have the psychic ability to know what I have read? Oh, your wrong BTW. I have read Cheney's energy plan. It closely matches the desires of those who paid for them to steal the presidency. One item of interest is the proposal to spend 2 billion on "clean coal research" while cutting funding on renewables. Do you suppose that they are going to hire an army of alchemists to convert all of that carbon in coal to hydrogen or what? Oh, that's right, Dubya, one of the deepest thinkers of our century, doesn't consider CO2 a problem, just like you. I note from the CO2 link from your site that you apparently consider the average temperature in Decatur, Illinois from 1950-1990 more important than the fact that the glaciers are rapidly melting, and Mt. Kilimanjaro is predicted to lose all of it's snow cover in about a decade. I would think that a sharp engineer like you could figure out that snow cover that has been there for centuries is more strongly correlated to the average world temperature than Decatur, Illinois. This is just one example of the spurious information on your site. I also note that almost all of the stuff on your site is a carbon copy of the propaganda put out by the Global Climate Coalition, one of the wrong wing's favorite disinformation groups. I am not going to spend the next week going over all of your stuff. Here is a site that does a good job of it for those who are interested in a balanced viewpoint rather than ridicule and outdated and spurious data. heatisonline.org In the meantime Tom, can you post some of the factually incorrect information that I have posted, or is ridicule your only method of operation? That is not very engineer-like. If you can't reply without the ridicule and name calling, don't bother, because you will be on ignore. Del