Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Trader who wrote (47693)	6/7/2001 10:17:22 AM
From: Ian@SI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

JC, I don't know NEWP. But I believe Zeev Hed is, or has been, a fan. Re SIA Forecast for 2002 and capacity utilization: (Different Post and poster) There are far too many moving parts to guesstimate capacity utilization knowing only the Total annual $ sales volume. For e.g., prices fall 30% / annum on average. That means that $100 of chip sales at yearend 2000, would be priced at $49 at yearend 2002 on average all else equal. And nothing else is equal. So the leadin statement is absolutely wrong if looking at any specific chip. During periods of overcapacity, prices fall faster than trend. That is certainly the case this year. Thus more chips must be sold to make up the $ volume. This tends to use up excess capacity quickly. During periods of rapidly falling prices, Fabs tend to reduce their costs / chips. One key way to do this is through shrinks or other process improvements giving them more good chips / wafer. Getting more working chips / wafer is the same as getting more capacity. More complex chips are made combining the function of 2 or more chips on a single chip, whether that's additional function, or just doubling the number of bits on a chip as is done with DRAM; or changing the mix of chips produced. In a nutshell, seeing more $ forecast is encouraging; but one would need to look at the forecast details before forming any capacity conclusion. And that presumes one also knows how much new, leading edge capacity is coming online; and how much old, trailing edge capacity is being mothballed. FWIW, Ian.

To: John Trader who wrote (47693)	6/7/2001 10:29:11 AM
From: Sultan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

OT.. Only one of their business is in optics arena and they probably have competition from the likes of DIGL EXFO. Nonetheless, based on their growth, I have a small position in NEWP and one that I plan to increase..

To: John Trader who wrote (47693)	6/7/2001 11:28:05 AM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

John, re >Newport Corp. (NEWP), in a few articles it has been referred to as the "Applied Materials of fiber optics".< I have this subjective opinion not to invest in "the next MSFT" or the "Applied Materials of fiber optics". Think about the statement "Applied Materials of fiber optics". It says you should invest in AMAT to be sure. :) PS: our free weekly local newspaper had a full page AMAT ad showing a Porsche. Many people just throw this paper away, so now I think Applied is just going for the publishers' goodwill. Gottfried