SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vampire who wrote (17269)6/7/2001 12:38:42 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30051
 
I really do not have any good explanation, except that AMAT was not hit as hard on the decline as the rest of the group, so it lets the rest to "play catch up"?

Zeev



To: vampire who wrote (17269)6/7/2001 12:46:41 PM
From: Alex MG  Respond to of 30051
 
Could just be the difference in market cap which makes KLAC more volatile than AMAT... Doesn't take as much liquidity to move it, but if it goes down it probably goes down harder.

Include NVLS in there also, it mirrors KLAC pretty well
finance.yahoo.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News