Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (47743)	6/7/2001 5:43:03 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Respond to of 70976

It will certainly not be obsolete in 6 months. Besides, if all those old PCs I keep were mules, by now I'd have a few hundred baby mules to sell and recover the costs <g> ST

To: michael97123 who wrote (47743)	6/7/2001 8:27:56 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Mike, re >thinking of buying a mule as opposed to a computer< Good idea. Mules don't double post. G.

To: michael97123 who wrote (47743)	6/7/2001 9:16:54 PM
From: Jerome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Computers vs a mule for Michael*** Mike, having recently reviewed your last 348 posts, I have come to the conclusion that a new computer is what you and the thread needs. You could post twice as many messages in half the time, with no double posts. The other alternative for the Bush income tax rebate would be for you to spend it all on some Prozac or some medicinal marijuana. The when AMAT goes down for five consecutive days in a row, you could post, "the sky is falling, be happy, have another on me" And none of us on the thread would feel your pain. Gottfried's charts would look good no matter how you held them, and you would be the first poster to getTito's Yo-Yo plays backwards. Having dealt with many mules and women, I haven't come to any conclusions as to which one can hurt you worse. Regards, Jerome