To: TA2K who wrote (3698 ) 6/14/2001 3:33:23 AM From: Coonhound Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3725 Hey Rocketman, Do you sit at home reading charts with a parachute strapped to your back, or do you just look up in the sky at night and read the stars? You are all over this board boasting about your TA, answering your own posts and speaking to yourself in the third person without one single bit of substance to your posts. Do you really know anything at all about TA? If so, why don't you show us the money. Why don't you, for once, tell us exactly which indicators you are putting to the IMAT chart, which parameters you are using and give us your highly qualified TA opinion of an actual chart including time periods. Rocket ships, cargo bays, parachutes and all that other stuff mean NOTHING. The only relevant TA term I've ever heard you use is your reference to the formation of a "head and shoulders", which, by the way, is included in the first lesson of TA 101. I looked at a 3 year chart of IMAT and I'm sorry to tell you that there is in fact NO FORMATION OF A HEAD AND SHOULDERS. However, Rocketman, I'll tell you what I'm prepared to do; I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that there is in fact a head and shoulder formation on the IMAT chart. Now, I recall from TA 101 that a head and shoulder is a long-term bearish formation (at least 1-3 years) with a long-term negative effect on a stock. How is it that you warn everyone to strap on their parachutes and jump because IMAT is going to tank according to your highly qualified interpretation of the chart with its' head and shoulders, then, just 9 days later you do a 180 and tell everyone to load up the cargo bay with IMAT shares? A bona fide head and shoulders often takes nearly as much time to play itself out as it does to form. Nine days? What kind of a TA is that? Now, Rocketman, please quit flapping your lips and give us something of substance for a change. Forget all about the rocket ships and parachutes and actually make an attempt to analyze a chart for us. Give us some indicators, parameters, time frames and a valid interpretation of a chart. Do you think we are all just about as bright as a bag-of-hammers and that we simply wouldn't understand your in-depth technical analysis if you were, for once, to give us one?