SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (9957)6/11/2001 7:44:09 PM
From: Ira Player  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10921
 
The holding companies provide some relief, but not a total elimination of taxes.

If we are going to have corporations, which are by definition a new and separate entity from the individual or individuals that created it, it must be treated from a tax perspective the same as other entities.

Why should the store on the corner that is owned by a corporation pay no taxes on it's profits while the street vendor that is selling the same product must pay taxes because he/she is an individual? Why should the individual suffer a government mandated cost structure that is at a disadvantage to the corporation?

Ira



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (9957)6/11/2001 8:02:22 PM
From: Jerome  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10921
 
Taxes are not a pass through cost to the consumer.... If corporations paid no taxes do you really think they would lower costs to the consumer? Here you are naive For years GM paid no taxes... did they lower the price on cars??? Every company that becomes highly profitable for whatever reason, finds some reason to increase executive compensation .Other employees come next and if any crumbs are left the shareholder might be considered. Either we find an equitable way to tax the corporations or the executives will splurge on themselves for a lot of stupid toys that they come to regret at a latter time.

Regards, Jerome