SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (137176)6/12/2001 12:22:41 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, Besting Dan is like taking candy from a baby. Why do you do it?



To: Paul Engel who wrote (137176)6/12/2001 12:43:47 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, thread, good post from the Motley Fool, which we were kicking around here today, about Intel margins. So, some of the posters over there are very good, in spite of the "management".

boards.fool.com

BTW, re "Here we are, nearly a year later, and AMD can only claim Jack-in-the-BOXX and Crackserver as server customers.

My prediction was PERFECT !!"

Some of the rest of us will take some of that action too.

Tony



To: Paul Engel who wrote (137176)6/12/2001 1:40:37 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: I was 1000% correct

Your post of last July:

how is the new c0 stepping going?"

EXCELLENT !!!!!

Looks like 1.13 GHz Pentium IIIs are binning out already !!

I'd say AMD will REALLY DO SOME PRICE cutting in response to Intel's improved speed distribution


That would explain Intel's 80% profit drop - it's because (in your special world) the 1.13GHZ PIII has had AMD on the ropes for almost a year.

:-)