Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (9662)	6/12/2001 1:25:19 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

No rule. But I do like having him to make fun of. I agree with the assessment of the posters and post, of course.... <g> That remark you referenced on BR was rather unkind of flappy and the sort of "third party" action that lefties of his ilk normally decry. Illustrates the hypocrisy of the vacant liberal mind to a "T". I shall take your request under advisement. JLA

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (9662)	6/12/2001 2:07:26 PM
From: Mr. Whist	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 59480

McGowan: I know it drives you nuts. However, instead of worrying all the time as to why I, a Roosevelt Democrat, am allowed to post on this thread, you should concern yourself with the following, more important, questions: (1) Do my posts expand the horizons of knowledge? If not, what steps can I take to improve my posts? (2) Are my posts well-written? Are all the words spelled correctly? Have I used quotation marks and semicolons correctly? For instance, in your previous post, you wrote: "... in contradiction to flappies disparaging comments towards this thread ..." You should have written it: "... in contradiction to Flappy's disparaging comments toward this thread ..." If we can't trust you to get your possessives right, how can we trust you on the bigger stuff? (3) Have I presented my arguments clearly? Have I documented my sources? Have I used legitimate news sources, or have I relied on rumor, trash-bashing, baiting, innuendo, newsmax.com, Limbaugh's Web site, hearsay, half-truths and lame arguments? This is where young Michael Cummings falls short, and I don't want to see you travel the same path. James, I'm sorry to say you (and others) have a little work to do if this thread is to be considered "above average."