Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (137259)	6/12/2001 10:51:29 PM
From: dale_laroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>But AMD expects the move from .18 A4 to SOI .13 A4 to take it from 1.7GHZ to 2.8GHZ.< Where are you coming up with 2.8 GHz. The chart shown at the Q1 CC seemed to indicate only 2.667 GHz for Barton.

To: Dan3 who wrote (137259)	6/13/2001 2:10:54 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Blow Hard Dan - re: "intel process generation " I realize you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but when you posted the table on Intel's past present and future processes, you clearly didn't pick up on some valuable information. To wit (dim-wit, in your case) P1262 is listed as 0.10 micron process - and the 12 denotes 300 MM wafer (approx. 12 inches) diameter. Now, Blow Hard One - what will AMD be countering this with in 2003 - 0.10 micron/copper process on 300 mm wafers? Do ya think AMD will still be looking for a sucker to pony up about 2 Billion Dollars to help build AMD's next gen fab for the year 2005 ?