Article...LARRY FLYNT:RIPPING THE SCABS OFF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY..
By: Bill Mayer
etherzone.com
Larry Flynt is the prototypical democrat in many ways.
His visage is one of a drunk – florid faced, bilious, porcine with rheumy little ferret like eyes in search of an easy kill. He is a pervert, a brutal sexual abuser of his own children, an abusive husband, a promoter of pornography, self absorbed and vindictive in the extreme.
“My father is a pornographer, a pimp, and a molester of children…He sexually abused me. On one occasion, my Dad was angry because I wouldn't stop crying. He came in, out of control with rage, and beat me over and over again with a belt. That night he came into my room and sexually molested me. He penetrated me with his fingers. He made me touch his penis. He had oral sex with me and made me have oral sex with him. I hadn't celebrated my thirteenth birthday when he did this to me. On many occasions, he would touch my breasts or grab me between the legs. One time he came into my bedroom, took my panties off, and fondled me.
When my sister and I visited my father, he made no effort to shield us from any of the brutal and humiliating pictures. He was proud of them. Twice he sent me pornographic Christmas cards stuffed with money. AT 8 or 9, my father made me and my sister go into a go go bar, dress up in revealing outfits, and dance for him on the stage like strippers. I can't tell you the damage these experiences did to my feelings about my body and to my sexuality. These are issues I will struggle with for the rest of my life.” - Jan 7, 1997 Statement by Tonya Flynt-Vega
His inner ugliness is certainly reflected in his grotesque physical appearance.
Flynt is not alone, unfortunately.
The Democrat Party is a rancid sausage assembled from the nightmare scrapings off some cesspool killing floor. It is an odious concoction of human garbage:
Senators who have killed others and have skated because of high family prominence
Married Congressmen whose girlfriends mysteriously disappear
Senators who are former members of the KKK and use the “N” word with impunity on national talk shows
Congressmen who have allowed male prostitution rings to be run out of their residences
Senators who are under imminent federal indictment
Congressmen who are defrocked judges
Presidents who are sexual abusers and who hire sexual abusers to be part of their Gestapo
Congressmen who are check kiting artists
Crooks
Liars
Cheats
DemoMaggots
These people are representative of the Nazi archetype, they attempt to present a “concerned” public servant persona to the citizenry while leading sleazy, dissolute and purposeless lives.
They seek political power to assuage their very well deserved sense of worthlessness, much in the way Hitler courted power as method of dealing with sexual confusion.
They are wild-eyed power mad junkies combing back street boroughs in search of that next angry vote.
Oh, and they will gladly ruin your lives if you allow it.
In a Salon Magazine review of The People vs. Larry Flynt, Charles Taylor perfectly states this maggot view of life, endorsing an attitude that "pisses on things like virtue, monogamy, God and patriotism."
Flynt states -"'I love Clinton...voted for him in '92. I voted for him in '96."
Flynt and Clinton and the entire leadership of the Democrat Party are all peas in the same rotten pod.
It is they who have perfected and continue to prosecute the Holy War of personal destruction.
Their marching plans could have been taken straight from Hillary Clinton's hero, communist "organizer" Saul Alinsky.
Using a phalanx of private investigators (Investigative Groups International among the biggest guns) and official government sources (F.B.I., C.I.A., and God knows who else) they have destroyed targets of opportunity using outright blackmail while at the same time feeding their numerous friends in the press all sorts of juicy tidbits on a background, non attribution basis.
There can be no doubt that Flynt's obscene "offer" to Jenna Bush, was coordinated and condoned by the Clinton/Gore/Democrat Gestapo.
The left really is different from just about any other political movement in history.
It has a bloody tradition, going back well over a century, of justifying anything to further its program of subjugation and tyranny. Evidence abounds - Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler (he was a socialist - the Nazi Party the National Socialist Workers Party), Mao - ALL of them knew the answer (a huge nanny state) and were willing to do anything to create it.
And why is this?
Socialism is their religion and this is their Holy War. Get in their way at your own peril.
The Clinton/Gore Gestapo differs from the above examples only in degree, no they haven't killed hundreds of millions - not yet anyway.
They essentially are the corrupt road builders to the site of future atrocities. Their path ends in one place only, totalitarian socialism. It may be the heavily nationalistic socialism of Hitler and Mussolini - It may be the inward directed and brooding socialism of Mao - It may be the jingoistic virulently subversive socialism of Stalin - But it WILL be totalitarian and it will be socialistic because freedom and socialism are mutually exclusive.
It is the one unalterable rule in political science that big government exists only to get bigger. As it gets bigger it grows more powerful. As it grows more powerful it restricts rights, even constitutionally protected rights, further and further.
It is a constantly accelerating force locking its victims in a death spiral.
It may already be too late to break its grip because with few exceptions the human race, under the yoke of government, has been led to believe that the state is its parent. You run to it for succor, you petition it for baubles not earned, you use its vast resources and police power to oppress your adversaries and you justify the result as being in the best interest of the whole.
Marx indeed had the seed of a brilliant idea with the development of his Hegelian based dialectical materialism.
The idea that an economic theory could also be predictive of future historical trends was a stroke of genius.
His mistake - his tragic mistake - was that he foresaw socialism as inevitably leading to ultimate freedom for the proletariat.
History has proven that it manifestly does not - It brings only death. |
