SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Whitman who wrote (9051)6/13/2001 1:14:45 PM
From: dawgfan2000  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 52237
 
Terry,

I'm not a diligent E-waver, but I heard something interesting yesterday from someone at a E-wave newsletter site...talk was about a down formation to about 265 in gold, then a shoot the moon to 320's. Have you heard anything similar from AA or on CFZ (I try, but just can't keep up there all the time, liked it better during the bull, fewer posts -gg-. There are some *good* posters over there).

tia,



To: Terry Whitman who wrote (9051)6/13/2001 2:24:25 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
>>You're gonna scare the kiddies with that Puetz info <<

Appreciate you telling me to look into it further. Last year's was probably an easy one, with a total lunar eclipse. This year's are only partial, but I can't imagine having two and no fireworks.

Anyone following LDCL? Am I the only paranoid here? They barely get the company public, Biggs comes out of his cave right before the IPO, Abby Jo goes psycho bull (again), the company needs cash (as do its VCs), and now Goldman yanks the rug out from under them. Can anyone tell me how none of this can be linked?



To: Terry Whitman who wrote (9051)6/13/2001 2:58:57 PM
From: dawgfan2000  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 52237
 
>>The oils may be worth a gamble here too.<<

I've been rethinking some of my M/E holdings, not that they aren't always under political pressure, but this was in this weeks WA Post. Mentions LOILY. Probably old news but...

washingtonpost.com