Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (17781)	6/13/2001 2:20:39 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 30051

SI duplicate. Zeev

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (17781)	6/13/2001 2:21:04 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30051

George, he should really get "off his high horse", are you guys paying for "poetry" or market analysis? It takes forever to get to what he thinks. The funny thing is that I think he is wrong and I have commented before here that a high trin which is not accompanied by excessively negative tic is far from being bullish, IMTO, it is bearish. Even a string of high trin and highly negative tic is not always the end of the bear move. I got caught in that mistake last year calling "a bottom" to the May decline a solid week ahead of time, we had about 7 days of tic under -1000 and trin consistently above 2.00, with trin above 2.00 (or 1.3, a new number I believe) but tic (and take it he is referring to the NYSE) positive, I would be careful here. Once more Hays and I do not agree. Zeev