SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (14987)6/13/2001 2:53:32 PM
From: Mike Buckley  Respond to of 22706
 
deleted



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (14987)6/13/2001 2:54:24 PM
From: Mike Buckley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22706
 
Frank,

Considering the nature of my dwindling assets, let's start with the most important part of your post: Of course, you won't be able to, and I'd be willing to bet on that. You give me a serious offer and I'll give it serious consideration. Settlement of the bet using PayPal will not be construed as a serious offer.

Thanks to Greg Hull, I spoke with "Benjamin," principal of Benjamin & Jerold at stockoptions.com He clarified twice on the phone that his firm has no income criterion for trading options and that it does allow naked options in an IRA.

You say that I am searching for a firm willing to take the risk of inappropriately approving me for options privileges. He says that the firms that use income as a criterion for authorization to trade options "are penalizing [me] for [my] success." He also says that the wire houses are using the federal government as the scapegoat, blaming them for preventing the individual investor from purchasing options in their IRAs, when in fact the only reason it's prevented is by their own choice; his understanding is that the federal government has exercised virtually no authority in the matter.

you are just unwilling to present your excellent financial condition in a manner that would relieve the brokerage of legal liability should they approve you.

Not true. You are confusing presenting my financial condition as they want to see it with presenting it factually while at the same time minimizing their legal risk. I offered to sign non-recourse agreements and was politely declined.

The devil is in the details and the proof is in the walk rather than the talk. However, if Benjamin & Jerold lives up to its claim remotely close to what I understood on the phone, I'd rather do business any day with that firm instead of Fidelity. After all, I can't pick up the phone and speak with Mr. Fidelity. Not only do I already have a personal rapport with a principal at Benjamin and Jerold, he also gave a glowing recommendation of an ice cream flavor.

--Mike Buckley