To: scoobypax who wrote (1070 ) 6/13/2001 2:48:12 PM From: Jenna Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1227 yes, at least we post from an address, and are not anonymous. These attacks mean nothing when they can come from Alcatraz or a like adobe, the state mental institution or a disgruntled competitor or someone whose resume was not accepted and yes occasionally, some of substance. We can tell who they are, its easy. The "significant" threads are the same disgruntled folk and nothing is new, by using the words SIGNIFICANT, doesn't make it so. Is reminiscent of the soap opera of scintillation perpetuated on these boards that led nowhere, which I have seen and been amused by for the last 4 years from the same people who have waged wars with no result and complained, argued, imposed law suits, strait jackets or whatever was at their disposal that would engender the 'fight group' and 'herd' to say 'aye' Let them instead channel their aggression, and energy to a productive and profitable endeavor. They have tried to take over SI and failed, and SI is finally under control of serious traders and everyday traders who want to share stock-related topics, no more anarchy. I think its significant that the same ones who address the BS have nothing to offer at all, not a trade, a stock, an analysis, a chart, absolutely nothing but rumor, innuendo, titillation and a need to fight. It means nothing, it won't change anything for us. WE plod on and we are will continue to plod ... there are no surprises for us on these boards, if you don't have a thick skin you run and hide or get incarcerated... we won't do either, thanks and you can unbookmark my BS thread, as I will do for many other threads myself. But as you ignored me in your post, you would have been exceedingly profitable if you were in the shorts we called today which except for 2 are all STILL SHORT and gaining more ground every minute.