Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dybdahl who wrote (58808)	6/14/2001 2:24:04 AM
From: Dinesh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

>but I see no logic why CO2 per area should be a fair way of measurement It is not CO2 per area but rather CO2 per political area. This is a game of numbers which anybody with a computer can play. There are essentially 3 ways one could work it out - - CO2 per capita. This will immediately excuse all poor nations and put us in a bad light. Bad bad bad! - CO2 per nation. This will be super-bad for us. Look, already states like Montana and Rhode Island wield such enormous power totally out of proportion to their population because of that 2-senator/state rule. - CO2 per political area. This gives us a lot of advantage since we got a lot of land. But in the end no matter who is playing this game, and how, we'll get it our way! We'll also buy our way out (trading rights.) Bush ain't no dummy. Nor was Clinton. Insofar as bicycling to work goes, a lot of Americans in the metropolitan areas also do. And they ride buses,subways, trains. People in Copenhagen do it probably because it keeps them from freezing ;) -D