Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColtonGang who wrote (153022)	6/13/2001 8:01:37 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

That still doesn't address the economics of who pays for these lawsuits. Do you think that the money is just printed (that would be very Democrat-like of you). ~SB~

To: ColtonGang who wrote (153022)	6/13/2001 8:18:49 PM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 769667

Do you think the Democrat Attorney General of the state of California would want to see lawyers raped who make too much profit? After all, he wants to see an energy executive raped and put in prison for making a profit? Why is it a business like energy can be assaulted from left wing Democrats for making too much money, but ambulance chasing lawyers never can be criticized for how much they make? Regarding my personal insurance, we have a combination of a few different programs. One of which is run by an HMO? Are you saying that unless you're personally affected by a government policy decision, you have no right to argue, or disagree with the faulty logic which goes into it? If so, that could lead to all kinds of idiotic examples. 1. Only welfare recipients can criticize welfare programs. 2. Only military personnel can criticize military pay or equipment shortages. Not to mention if and when we go to war. 3. Only people having access to a 401K today, can argue about expanding or protecting it. 4. Only social security recipients can argue about the social security system. Pretty stupid thought process isn't it Colton? I thought you would agree.... Mike