Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (108760)	6/14/2001 12:01:32 PM
From: Don Lloyd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Grace - I thought the goal of statistics was to prove that the three lemon drops were going to go to the richest 1% of the players. No, that's political economics. One honey lemon drop goes to DC, one goes to Brussels, and GE can keep the one that fell on the carpet. Regards, Don

To: GraceZ who wrote (108760)	6/14/2001 12:30:40 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 436258

< thought the goal of statistics was to prove that the three lemon drops were going to go to the richest 1% of the players. > LOL, no that's statisticians employed by democratic pacs! DAK

To: GraceZ who wrote (108760)	6/14/2001 12:54:37 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Grace-- Think about what you said. >>>I thought the goal of statistics was to prove that the three lemon drops were going to go to the richest 1% of the players.<<< Well of course the richest 1% of the players of a given machine get the three lemon drops. They are by definition the "winners" aren't they? The machine pays out the big money because they pulled three lemon drop? Does that not make them richer than the other 99% of the players of that machine? <ggg> Then you have to consider who the real winner is and we know that's always the House...The White House...The House of Representatives...(and the Senate.)<ggg>