Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (1612)	6/14/2001 2:55:52 PM
From: Bob Trocchi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50301

N. Dixon... Thanks for the info. I guess that shuts me up!!! Dam, you just don't know who you can trust these days. Back to Lurking and I am still not convinced that RFER will produce the level of profits that longs are hoping for but certainly al things seem to be pointing up, up and away. Good Luck Bob T.

To: N. Dixon who wrote (1612)	6/14/2001 10:25:04 PM
From: D. Chapman	Respond to of 50301

Do you know how much that street.com fax newsletter is?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (1612)	6/15/2001 10:11:09 PM
From: Doc Bones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50301

I've followed Adam Lashinsky for a long time, and I think he is one of the most honest people writing about stocks. I don't think it's fair to say that Lashinsky was "in cahoots" with the shorts. He did write an article on REFR that was negative. What was wrong was posting the article on Realmoney.com with no indication that it had already been sent to the hedge funds. From The Times: People in the newsroom say that Mr. Lashinsky, Mr. Kansas and others complained that providing the article to the hedge funds first put the individual investors at a disadvantage — potentially enabling the hedge funds to profit at the other readers' expense by trading shares of Research Frontiers first. So Kansas, who quit, and Lashinsky objected to publishing the article later on Realmoney.com. The Times indicates indirectly that it was probably Cramer's idea: Mr. Kansas also clashed with James J. Cramer, a founder of the company and its largest shareholder, over editorial issues, people at the company said. Mr. Cramer left his position managing a hedge fund in January to devote himself to writing for TheStreet.com and advising Thomas J. Clarke, its chief executive. Mr. Cramer had previously publicly criticized TheStreet.com's management, and he became a vociferous presence in the office. Mr. Cramer declined to comment. The Times was in partnership with TheStreet.com for awhile, and I get the impression that Cramer may not be their favorite guy. I've posted a similar message before: Message 15940990 ------- Asensio declared a short on REFR today: biz.yahoo.com The REFR short is getting a lot of attention, which could work both ways. Doc (No knowledge / position on REFR)