Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stan_hughes who wrote (1119)	6/14/2001 5:49:43 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

------------------Stan quite the fantasy story----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott - I've seen bigger traders work their tushes off for less when the trade is a slam dunk profit and can be closed back out within 24-48 hours, if not sooner. ----------------At first we are led to believe that Stan could have stopped the BreX disaster before it started. Just how no one knows. He hasn't elaborated. Now we are to believe that he has personally seen traders work their tushes off for less. I for one would like to know how. Are we to believe that Stan is really a high finance broker/trader. I would really like an elaboration on this one. But I won't get it. As with everything else he has said its just a statement with no follow through facts to support it. A kid in a high school debating club would run all over Stan--------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Your example of 10K shares at a $0.50 spread? Five grand is still five grand. I can always use an extra easy five grand, what about you? -------------------- Well lets see a bigger trader should probably mean someone who deals with trades in the hundreds of thousands of to millions of dollars. If that person is working for a brokerage firm with assets under management of tens of billions or more. Just what would his bosses say to him wasting time making for the firm ONLY $5000. That trader would be thrown out on his ass. Wasting time. So as usual get real Stan.---------------------------------------- As expected, in the case of AY it has magically recovered and will now be sold for a fast buck by those that covered and doubled up to net long via the underwriting, making yet a few more shekels on the way back up. ----------------------------- And now with this little bit with AY drawing to a happy close and as Stan says it was totally expected. I am left to wonder just how much Stan made from this sure thing. I am almost 100% certain the answer is 0 . He never like others here , myself included, before hand stated he got into this. Now just why is that. I guess we all know the answer to that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If anybody cannot see how rigged this all is, I suggest you stay away from stock markets and street vendors offering 5-1 payoffs for guessing which shell the pea is under ROFLMAO I'm done on this subject, there's nothing more to say that hasn't already been said. ---------------------------------- For Stan there really isn't anything more to say. He hasn't said anything that he can prove with even the smallest bit of evidence. Too bad he hasn't ellaborated more on his high and mighty plans to crush the activities of the institutions. On the off chance that Stan was serious that he was going to run to clean up the securities commission. I will keep this little exchange. So in the off chance he does run and fails to do anything about it because he can't. I can at least look back on this for a nice big belly laugh. Hell I'm laughing now------------------------------------------ Peter