Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (39892)	6/14/2001 2:13:43 PM
From: Crystal ball	Respond to of 50167

Forget CHINA, The High Tech Future is in INDIA, wireless growing 88%, Communist China can never match that, just as the DoCoMo roll out of 3G streaming media video telephony with PALM inside etc, keeps me thinking that you have to go where the MONEY IS ALREADY, like PALM in EUROPE and JAPAN and where ENGLISH is the lingua franca of the economy, which is INDIA that gives US more H1B high tech visa workers than anywhere else, mostly because Communist China is a tower of Babylon, thousand of languages, hundreds of language families, only a single chinese calligraphy written character tying it together with is not conducive to DIGITALIZATION since our 26 letter alphabet is 24/48 bytes, but the chinese alphabet takes thousands of characters millions of bytes. Not so India, where English or other sanskritic alphabets are, like ours, analytic, deductive, unlike inductive chinese. Democracy, Decentralization and Individualism will reign in the future, not mindless slaves. I could say more, but I am bullish unlike the Darkest Before the Dawn Delith article, except I agree that this is or was the bottom, and the DAWN is now rising before US. Wireless will rule, storage will serve. Truly your$, -Crystal Ball

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (39892)	6/14/2001 3:44:42 PM
From: Luce Wildebeest	Respond to of 50167

Ike funny you should post this. My largest long holding a telecommunication equip. maker happens to be slipping more than I could have imagined. <NMSS>

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (39892)	6/14/2001 6:57:12 PM
From: gerard mangiardi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50167

My posts are normally one sentence wonders. About a year or so ago I asked the question what will happen if the american consumer becomes satiated? It is still in my mind the major risk to the world economy. It is something that is looming out there. That said I am currently very bullish in my outlook for the next six months. Barrons recently had a bit on oil which suggested that for the last year or so oil output has exceeded consumption. Marginal wells are now profitable and OPEC is faced with a stark choice. Either lower prices to sustain market share or have the world economic slowdown do it for them and watch prices plummet as a result. The OPEC ministers are smart men and I believe they will want lower prices to sustain both market share and world demand in a manner they think they can control. This recession was brought on by OPEC and OPEC will end it. The combination of fiscal, monetary and energy stimulus is what I would call a super goldilocks scenario. I also suspect that contrary to current opinion telcos will soon be forced to buy big for broadband capacity as in the US at least those networks are currently at or close to capacity. A spending boom is about to begin and networkers in this area will benefit. I am not so sure about some semi companies and PC manufacturers as lots of people have a PCs and there is no urgent need to upgrade- no killer ap to force the move. Too bad the present administration is so pro big business. New attitudes that came with them have helped exacerbate the slowdown in CAPEX by telcos. The energy policy will not result in a building boom because investment in thsi area is driven by prices not costs of plants. There is no need to wreck havoc on the environment which is what policy as I have read it wants to do. What na embarrassment to try to have Bush lobby for the ge hon deal. Haw effective could he be anyway the way this administration has decided to make unilateral policy decisions? It has only helped to alienate the rest of the world toward the US. Stocks I currently like are irf gnss fdry ibm msft and amx. There are plenty more. BTW last quarter I did quite well buying options of tech cos that didn't warn. I would love to hear from people those tech companies that my actually beat expectations this quarter.