SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (16798)6/15/2001 10:16:04 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
There is something to the audit problem, but that does not bear directly on the constitutionality of the tax itself. I will look into a couple of other things......



To: gao seng who wrote (16798)6/15/2001 10:20:38 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
The Britannica asserts that the amendment was ratified, and I can find no mention of a defect in Ohio statehood.....



To: gao seng who wrote (16798)6/15/2001 11:24:48 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
By being forced to filll out this
form,you are giving evidence against yourself,a clear violation of the
fifth amendment.

If the 16th amendment itself allows for such an auditing procedure then it supercedes the 5th on this one issue. If it does not that would make the auditing procedure argueably unconstitutional but not the income tax itself.

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News