Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (16906)	6/15/2001 6:21:22 PM
From: gao seng	Respond to of 82486

You haven't indulged anything but your fetish to put on exhibition your obsession with calling some one a nut. Maybe Freud should be consulted? I say this for the final time. You think that Jefferson would not recognize America without slave girls to chase around. The implication of such a remark is that Jefferson would be unsupportive of abolition. This would therefore invalidate anything he has to contribute to a public discussion, since an evangelist of his words would be labeled a racist. I find this a very solid argument. And I find it utterly contemptious that someone has such a low lack of esteem that they feel compelled to ridicule American icons just for a little attention. You may feel that I am wrong. You have not replied why you feel that way, so I guess you do not care that find you contemptious. And I will let it go at that. You know how I feel and I know how you feel. You feel that the mere mention of saying Jefferson had slaves is not racists. I agree with that, but in the context your ejaculation was globbed into, I think it very plausible that your intent was to denigrate Jefferson and the Constitution. I will be happy to ignore your next insult, but even happier to see some sort of decency in you by an honest reply saying if you were just spouting off some nonsense, or were you being intentionally offensive?