SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : NEW Discussions of trading sites -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: smchan who wrote (207)6/17/2001 12:07:49 AM
From: Patricia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 424
 
lol

Get to bed Sam, your in enough trouble today. <s>



To: smchan who wrote (207)6/17/2001 12:12:00 AM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Respond to of 424
 
LOL. I didn't even know this thread existed. I think I have entered The Twilight Zone or perhaps an insane asylum ;-)



To: smchan who wrote (207)6/17/2001 12:12:10 AM
From: Jenna  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 424
 
Hey what about the law suit? How come we were not served? You mr. smchan are part of the parasites on SI, let me make something perfectly clear. THERE WAS NO LAW SUIT, THERE WILL BE NO LAWSUIT, THERE WAS NOTHING BUT THE FRUSTRATION OF THE POSTERS LIKE TIM LUKE, SMCHAN,PATRICIA, LOLA, AND A FEW OTHERS WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THEMSELVES BUT DECIDE TO WEAVE A WEB OF DECEIT out of ENVY, disdain and pure malevolence. ... what happened? The count went bankrupt, the other friend is more or less constantly suspended and who knows where he appears when he isn't suspended. Before we leave SI, we want to make perfectly clear THAT ALL THE POST PERPETUATED ON SI FOR THE LAST 3 MONTHS WERE SOLELY imaginery, weaved by the likes of Tim Luke, with the help of bob, smchan, patricia, Lola and others. If we are wrong, we are waiting to see it. People seem bored, they want to weave things against success where they have failed, its common nature, but at least they can be SHOWED UP FOR THE SCAMS they are. We are forging ahead, going where commercial sites belong. We leave SI to see the scam perpetuated. Why was it allowed to last for 15 weeks? I think it had to do with the titillation value of the interest during the time SI was rapidly losing posters. Will it continue? No because the perpetrators are looking silly and have nothing to say any longer. The perpetrators have their own problems trying to engender interest in a dying theme and groveling to save their own faces. They have pie on their faces and are looking like chimpanzees fighting the 'good fight'... smchan... you are pathetic and so is your cohert. We have kept quiet for weeks giving you the rope from which you are hanging yourselves in a web of lies. You telegraphed punches for months, came up with nothing, while others were quiet and have quite a lot of damning information. smchan, you have kept a little at a distance, but you are also going to be included in a counter suit for false allegations. and like bob says, hope you have a large bank account.



To: smchan who wrote (207)7/3/2001 9:21:49 AM
From: greg huyser  Respond to of 424
 
>>And yes, I *do* walk on water. :-)
>>http://www.mindspring.com/~smchan/photos/ski1.jpg

I like this pic better:
mindspring.com

Don't even remember how I got to this thread. Just following results of a search. Bye.