To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (48046 ) 6/17/2001 11:16:02 AM From: orkrious Respond to of 70976 We know it will not be a net negative for the economy since more money is in the hands of consumers. No question. I just don't see much benefit, even if they blow the money on an electronic gadget.At the VERY LEAST, it will be psychological boost that people have more money coming to them and may be less inhibited in purchasing a new MP3 player or the such. I personally don't think that $300 ($600 per couple) is going to make one whit of difference to the average, over-indebted person worried about a slow economy and his or her job.Mike and Michele Sherman might save as much as $6,300, or 22 percent of their 2000 tax bill, from the fully phased-in breaks — as long as they don't fall victim to the Alternative Minimum Tax. I am sure that this statistic looks out five or six years, whenever the vast majority of the tax cuts take place. My guess is that these tax cuts, which consumers won't have for a while, will be repealed as the economy slows and the surplus vaporizes. For the vast majority of people, most of the tax cut comes in few years, not now.The AMT is also a big issue. I was shocked in 1999 when I got my return back from my accountant and had to pay a huge AMT. I do not understand how you could have gone from being so Bullish a year or two ago, to be super Bearish now, AFTER we have seen a decline of 60-90% for most technology companies. The underlying fundamentals have dried up for the semiconductor companies, and I don't believe the stock prices of many, and especially the semi equips, reflect the bleak outlook. With fabs running at 30-40% of capacity, there can be a big pickup in demand and additional capacity won't be needed. The internet bubble added too much capacity, it will take a while to use it up. I recognize that stock prices should pick up six to nine months before the fundamentals, but the semi equips are already trading as if we are 2/3 of the way into an upcycle. I like the companies, just not the stock prices. For people with a two or three year outlook, todays prices are fine. But I'm not buying back into the sector unless I get better value, which I suspect I won't have to wait long for. My guess is that with all of the semiconductor warnings last week, along with companies like Nokia, INTC's optimism is already starting to be perceived as hollow. In fact, I believe last week was the beginning of a change in people's perception. No, there isn't going to be a sharp, V-shaped recovery. The industry will eventually be fine, but the stocks are priced as if things are going back to their old huge growth rates in the second half of the year. It isn't going to happen, and the stocks are coming down. The only thing keeping them up is the huge short interest, causing a small rally every time someone says the news can't get any better, the bottom is in.Do you believe that the end of the road is upon us for technology? No. I just think that many stocks are still overvalued. Many stocks are down 80-90% from their highs, but not the ones which some of the brokerage houses deemed to be at the "bottom" two months ago.And using words like bullsh** do absolutely nothing to help me see your point of view FWIW. Actually, sometimes words like bullsh*t are most appropriate, especially when dealing with politicians' promises. Jay