Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Adams who wrote (109106)	6/17/2001 2:31:19 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Mark, Thankyou, I was unaware the meaning of "value stocks" was that precise. Although some of these funds have done well this year, the picture is mixed when you look at "profile" and see the 2yr chart. Also I notice you can see the top holdings in each fund. These will be the "value stocks" I guess. biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com biz.yahoo.com (Yahoo is great for a free service) and the funds could have sold them by now. So you are right, it's difficult to track "value stocks" as there would be changes when the funds decide a particular stock is fully valued and sell um. So... it makes my original point just as clear. It will be the funds that are "bullish" if they are well managed, the overall trend for stocks is DOWN by all measurements we know of. edit i.e. the original subject..the barrons article is opaque or misleading regarding bullish market conditions. Do I have this right? pearly.