SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: changedmyname who wrote (11937)6/18/2001 2:14:13 PM
From: Sir Francis Drake  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15615
 
Sure, but on the other hand, nobody wonders if Q is fully funded, the way some do wonder (however wrongly) about GX. That "security" is worth paying a premium for many, hence Q has a p/e higher than TCM for example or GX for that matter.

Be that as it may, Q just broke their 52 week low. Welcome to the club - GX has been doing it for awhile, and is well practiced :)

At this point, it really doesn't matter how low GX falls, from my point of view, it is worth buying, the lower the better. I wouldn't buy it over $10, but here in the $7's... yes, the cheap get cheaper, but look at it this way, there's only $7 to $0, LOL! No sweat. Q has a lot further to fall than GX, hence, I don't mind buying GX at these prices. At some point, the selling has to stop. Then the hard part starts, getting the price up, LOL! It is one thing to buy at a "low" price - many are willing. But quite another getting stuck with that "low" price for a long time, I'm afraid not many are prepared for that!

Morgan



To: changedmyname who wrote (11937)6/19/2001 12:50:42 PM
From: changedmyname  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15615
 
Not sure if already posted, but here are views from Mer yesterday:

Morning Notes Summary – 18 June 2001
2
Global Crossing (GX; $9.55; D-1-1-9)
Dec00A d$2.69; 01E d$3.11 (Intra-Day Bulletin ran
6/15/01)
Financial Outlook Strong, Reiterate Buy Rating
 We have fielded several questions today regarding the
funding outlook, ILEC sale and revenue mix at Global
Crossing.
 We retain our confidence that Global Crossing is fully
funded. We predict the company will reach positive
free cash flow for 2003E with around $1B of liquidity
to spare.
 We also believe that industry trends from purchasing
bandwidth on shorter term leases (vs. long term IRUs)
will not materially affect Global Crossing. In fact, as
argued in our 1Q review published May 25th, we
believe that for fully funded carriers, the shift towards
shorter term leases is positive for several reasons.
 First, shorter term leases are worth more in terms of
both gross revenue per unit and NPV. Relative to
IRU prices, short term pricing premiums are high and
payback periods are short. For example, total
payments received over a three to four year lease will
be roughly equal to the cost of a 15 year IRU. Since
the capacity can then be resold (several times over 15
years), the present value of total cash inflows is
greater (repeat sales are worth more than the time
value of money in those first few years). In this
respect, the IRU is really just a financing vehicle.
 Second, short term leases don't have materially
negative near term cash flow impact as some have
erroneously argued. Although short term leases bring
in less cash up front than IRU sales, lease contracts
from carrier customers can still be monetized by
borrowing against the future receivables, if necessary.
 Third, we believe Global Crossing's core international
carrier customers still want long term IRU deals.
While certain types of bandwidth customers want
shorter term deals, we believe this trend is less
pronounced among Global Crossing's core
international carrier customers (ie, Deutsch Telekom),
which generally face less short term capital constraints
and greater need to lock in very long term capacity
than web centric start ups. Also they are happy to
secure capacity as an asset since it takes an expenses
item out of EBITDA and places it in the depreciation
line of their P&Ls.
 On the near term funding front we note that the sale of
Frontier ILEC to Citizens Utilities is on track. On
May 25th, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
approved the $3.5B sale, which we believe will close
by end-June. In its latest prospectus, Citizens stated
the same expectation as to timing and price. We
expect Global Crossing to net around $2B of cash (net
of tax and repayment of an outstanding bridge loan)
from the sale.
 Note that the move by competitor 360networks to
miss an interest payment today is an important
positive for long term players in the subsea bandwidth
space - we highlight Global Crossing and TyCom as
beneficiaries of the reduced competitive intensity
likely to result from the heightened financial woes at
this company. We see Global Crossing as a potential
buyer of selected pieces of 360networks were the
company to be broken up - for example its Atlantic
cable to add capacity/redundancy and 360americas to
provide more POPs and greater diversity in routes
back to the US - but think it very unlikely Global
Crossing would have an interest in the whole
company.
 Our rating remains Buy for both the intermediate and
long terms.
(A.Quinton/ C. Irvine/ J. Moynihan/ E. Sheridan)